your inbox is a disaster and it's not your fault

13 min read

I used to judge people for their overflowing inboxes. You know those screenshots where someone's mail app shows a gargantuan unread count? I'd cringe wondering why they wouldn't just deal with it. I mean, how hard is it to stay on top of your email? Turns out: very hard.

I'm officially in year 2 of working for a startup, and that's brought with it a lot of late nights and weekends with less time to spend on small but important tasks like working out, laundry and deleting D2C email pollution. In less than a year I went from inbox zero to inbox disaster. I'd try to do some cleanup here and there, but while the Gmail app on my phone is limited in its ability to help, I was more surprised by how hard it was to do deep cleaning even on the desktop web. The power was there, you just might have to do 6-7 clicks and queries first. Cleaning it up was so much harder than I first thought it would be that built my own app to help me do it (more on that another time), but now I've finally got it down from 14,500+ emails to 14 and I feel like I can finally breathe again but also I have a lot of thoughts about how I got here in the first place.

The short version? The system is rigged. The biggest marketing operations in the world have decided your inbox is their billboard, and they've spent years engineering ways to keep it that way.

But thats not all. Here's what I learned.

Transactional emails have been weaponized

The fourth largest contributor to my inbox disaster was transactional emails stretched well beyond their original purpose.

Transactional emails like order confirmations, shipping updates and delivery notifications are legally exempt from unsubscribe requirements under CAN-SPAM. The logic makes sense on paper. You ordered something. You need to know when it ships. It's a service message based on your actions, not marketing. But retailers figured that as long as they put the transactional content at the top, they could slip in some other "related" messaging with promotional content and still skip the unsubscribe link. In the eyes of the law, if the "primary purpose" is transactional, the whole email counts as transactional.

This one makes me genuinely angry because shipping updates, order confirmations, delivery notifications are emails I actually want to get. This is stuff I need to know, but instead of just sending me the info I care about, companies want to cram more and more promotional content into these emails. Now, what could have been one email turns into 10 with atomic level detail about every step of the process. It also makes triaging your email a nightmare because the emails you want to see are now a major source of inbox pollution.

Let's take a look at a recent sequence of emails I got from Amazon when I ordered a surge protector, some USB-C cables, and a charger.

Email 1: Order confirmation. Totally normal and expected transactional email. No opt out.

Email 2: Two days later, subject: Included with your Amazon order: Free 90 days of music. This is a promo for Amazon Music, but because they tied it to my order, there's no unsubscribe link.

Email 3: Shipping notification, except the email body is roughly half shipping info and half Cyber Monday deals. No opt-out.

Email 4: Delivery confirmation for a different item than the one that shipped hours earlier. Also stuffed with Cyber Monday promos. No opt-out.

Email 5: Another item shipped. More ads. No opt-out.

Email 6: Next day, a delay notification for one item. This one, mercifully, was just the delay info without any ads. No opt-out.

Emails 7 and 8: Later that day, two delivery confirmations for items that arrived in the same delivery in separate boxes. Received as two separate emails, seconds apart, with different promotional content. No opt-out.

Email 9: The following day, a request to rate the marketplace seller for one of the items. This is the first email in the entire sequence with an actual opt-out option.

Email 10: Different item out for delivery. No promos this time. No opt-out.

Email 11: That item delivered. Promos are back. No opt-out.

Email 12: Two days later, a reminder to rate the marketplace seller (with opt-out).

Email 13: A week later, another reminder to rate that seller (with opt-out).

Email 14: The next day, another Amazon Music promo similar to Email 2, but this time it only vaguely references "your recent Amazon purchase" without linking to or showing the actual order number, but this one DOES have an unsubscribe link.

Emails 15 and 16: More review request emails sent "on behalf of" the brands I bought from.

That's a grand total of 16 emails for ONE order over two weeks. Most without unsubscribe options, many with equal or more promotional real estate than actual information and almost all of which could have been consolidated into fewer emails per day.

Walmart runs a lighter version of the same playbook: instant order confirmation > following by a reminder to add items to your order before its shopped > substitution/out-of-stock notice if they're out of something > ready-for-pickup/delivery alert > pickup/delivery confirmation > review request > experience survey request.

To their credit, Walmart clearly labels their review and survey emails as advertisements with opt-out links and most of the transactional emails don't have promotional content (though sometimes the initial order confirmation has some promotional links near the very bottom). However, I was really confused when I noticed some transactional Walmart emails without explicit unsubscribe links still prompted Gmail's native unsubscribe button. I don't know if this means the email had some kind of behind-the-scenes opt-out hidden in the emails HTML or obscured by CSS or if Walmart and Google worked something out but I did see that some of Walmart's transactional emails cause Gmail to display a lightning bolt icon indicating it uses Gmail's dynamic email format. I even tried clicking every possible link in one of those review emails to see if it would take me to a preferences page and none of them did, but eventually I found the option buried in my account settings and was able to turn them off, so at least Walmart gives you a way out (and Gmail might be easier than the usual way unsubscribe from them, but only inside Gmail).

Now, not all transactional emails are bad. Some amount of "extra" transactional email can be good, or at least more acceptable than others. If you book a flight months in advance, you expect an immediate confirmation of your reservation, but it's not necessarily bothersome to get an email confirming your flight details 48 hours before it boards, especially if something about your flight or departing airport had changed since your booking. A separate reminder to check-in is also pretty universally useful, especially if there are concerns about known delays on the day or travel the carrier might want to make you aware of or if you're traveling on a carriers where how fast you check-in determines your boarding position. All of these emails often don't have unsubscribe links either, but they all feel like service first, not marketing-first.

Out of all the emails I got from my flights this year, the ones I got after boarding my flights contained a grab bag of justifications in their footers: "because you subscribe to Account Summary or News and Offers," "because you subscribe to Account Summary emails," "because you flew with us recently." Some of the most nakedly promotional emails I sent even had no unsubscribe links. When I finally logged-in to their platform to go opt-out of some of those lists, I found I'd already unsubscribed from some categories but not others. Which made me realize I'd probably done this dance before, and then new categories got added later that my previous opt-out didn't cover.

But the thing that's unmistakable is what transactional marketers are optimizing for. You're already a target customer and this is a direct channel to speak directly to you about the thing they know you care about. Most of the time, these transactional emails were big on headline and light on detail. You need to click a link/button to see the rest of the details so they cab pull you back into their app or website where they can throw personalized recommendations at you based on everything they know about your purchase history. Transactional emails weaponize your need for information while circumventing your ability to say no, and that inability to say no is why they pile up so fast.

DTC brands will absolutely flood your inbox

The third biggest contributor to my inbox disaster came from marketing emails from direct-to-consumer retailers. I won't name names, but every DTC brand I bought a Christmas gift from last year has been sending me roughly two emails per week all year long.

Then November hit and all hell broke loose.

Those same brands ramped up to three emails every two days. Some days I got multiple emails from the same company before lunch. The economics make total sense from their side. Email marketing is basically free after setup. Open rates hover around 15-20 percent. Even a one percent conversion rate prints money at scale. They have every incentive to send more.

Research shows 79% of consumers report ignoring or deleting marketing emails from brands they voluntarily subscribed to at least half the time. The brands know this. They just don't care. If four out of five emails get ignored, the answer isn't to send fewer, better emails. It's to send five times as many.

And when you finally decide to unsubscribe? Good luck. Research from EmailTooltester found the average subscriber encounters over six dark patterns when trying to cancel, with an average of nearly seven clicks from homepage to cancellation. Some brands hide the unsubscribe link in tiny gray text. Others make you log in first. A few require you to "confirm" your unsubscribe via a second email, which feels like a trap designed to make you give up halfway through.

I want to support journalism but I can't read fast enough

The second biggest contributor to my inbox disaster was newsletters I wanted and sometimes paid for.

I subscribe to several paid newsletters because I genuinely want to support good analysis and reporting. But there's a brutal math problem lurking here. If you subscribe to five newsletters that each publish two or three long pieces per week, that's 40 to 60 articles per month you need to read to get your money's worth on top of everything else fighting for your attention.

I was simply paying for newsletters I wasn't reading. At some point that's not a subscription anymore. That's philanthropy. And while I'm happy to support writers I respect, if it's purely charitable giving, there are other causes that need my money too.

So I cut back. It wasn't easy. I felt guilty unsubscribing from people whose work I admire.

The irony is that of the newsletters I kept, I don't consume them exclusively through email anyway. I find their articles via links on social media. Then I log in through an email magic link, which is its own form of inbox pollution (more on that later). The actual newsletter emails just sit there unread, making me feel bad about myself.

That's kind of the biggest problem with the paid newsletter model as a self-contained ecosystem. A newsletter isn't its own best channel to grow. Sure, some people forward issues to friends and that generates interest, but social media is where the real opportunity lives. That's where people share links and find like-minded readers willing to pay. Social media is also where I discovered most of the writers I eventually subscribed to. I'd click through to their paywalled stuff and want more.

But I just don't have the time.

My favorite paid newsletter, Stratechery, survives in my life specifically because it's also a daily podcast. I can listen while doing other things. That's the only reason I actually keep up with it.

I know there have been several attempts to solve this. Separate apps with their own subscriptions. AI-narrated audio versions. But I couldn't make any of them stick. The best solution I've found is Substack's centralized reading experience with saved progress, which sucks because I have my own issues with Substack. Some of the writers I follow can get a bit verbose (like me), and I love a well-researched, well-reasoned deep dive. But sometimes that's not suited for scrolling on my phone for a few minutes. Podcasts give me two things email doesn't: a single place to access everything and the ability to pause and resume exactly where I left off.

For my money, The Verge has the best value in tech journalism right now. Fifty dollars a year gets you ad-free podcasts, a cleaner website, and subscriber-only stuff. Compare that to ten dollars a month for a single newsletter with multiple long articles per week, delivered only via email or a standalone website. No shade to anyone in particular, but the math is just not working for me.

Notifications drown themselves out

And finally, the smallest of the big four but the one that's entirely on me: notifications I had explicitly opted into. GitHub alerts. Bank/budget pings. Reminders I actually wanted.

Some of these are incredibly useful. Others are pure noise. The problem is that many services won't let you pick and choose all the notifications. It's all or nothing. So I kept them on because occasionally they'd surface something important I need to catch.

But thats's also the trap. For those important alerts to actually reach me, my inbox can't be buried under everything else. My signal-to-noise ratio collapsed and critical notifications got lost under DTC spam and promotional "shipping updates," which meant the notifications I wanted became useless anyway. The noise defeated itself.

The zombie lists will find you

Here's an honerable mention category I didn't expect. Marketing emails from brands I have accounts with but never remember signing up to get newsletters from.

Samsung. Peacock. Jabra. My bank. My 401k. My car dealership. My electric company. My gas company. Olive Garden.

And then there's Dollar Shave Club. I haven't subscribed to their razors in maybe 13+ years, but a few months ago they just started emailing me again. No explanation. No re-confirmation request. Just emails showing up like nothing happened. I've gotten 26 from them this month alone. It's gotta be some kind of zombie list thing. Probably some mix of privacy policy changes nobody reads, terms of service updates that reset preferences, corporate acquisitions that merge email lists, or just old-fashioned zombie list tactics where dormant addresses get reactivated for a new campaign.

Anywhere you've ever had an account or received an email receipt has probably added you to marketing lists. Whether you agreed explicitly or not. And even if you opted out years ago, there's a decent chance some policy update or database migration quietly opted you back in.

This is why inbox bankruptcy doesn't actually work long-term. You can declare email zero today. But some account you created in 2015 will decide next month that you definitely want to hear about their new product line.

One-time codes are quietly piling up

One final honorable mention: "magic" links and one-time login codes.

Every time you sign into a service that uses email-based authentication, you get an email that has zero value after you click the link. But deleting it means going back to your email app after you've already bounced over whatever you were logging into.

On mobile this is especially annoying. You tap the email. Tap the link. Get thrown into the app or browser. Do what you needed to do. And then the email is still sitting there back in your email. You have to switch back to your mail app just to delete something you used for three seconds. You can't open the link and delete at the same time, so eventually you forget, and these start piling up.

These weren't a huge percentage of my inbox. But they accumulate.

The system works exactly as designed. Just not for you

So here's what I finally understood after cleaning out 14,000 emails.

Your inbox being out of control is not a personal failing. It's the intended outcome.

Email marketers know exactly what they're doing. They know the five seconds it takes to unsubscribe feels like more friction than just deleting. They know that mixing promos into transactional emails lets them dodge opt-out requirements. They know most people won't dig through account settings to find the right toggles. They know that sending three emails instead of one triples their odds of catching you at the right moment.

Gmail, for all its sophistication, has mostly enabled this. The Promotions tab creates the illusion of control. Your marketing emails are "handled." But really they're just warehoused, not blocked. Gmail reportedly delivers over 90 percent of commercial email to Promotions rather than spam. That's a feature for marketers, not for you. And Gmail runs ads in the Promotions tab too, so they have no real incentive to reduce the volume.

US law doesn't help either. We operate on an opt-out model. Companies can email you until you explicitly tell them to stop. The EU requires explicit opt-in consent before any marketing contact, which is part of why European inboxes tend to be a bit less chaotic. But here? You're fair game by default.

The FTC tried to do something about this with a "click-to-cancel" rule that would've made unsubscribing as easy as signing up. Industry groups sued. The rule got blocked in court earlier this year.

There's one bright spot. The FTC sued Amazon over Prime's notoriously difficult cancellation process. Internally, Amazon reportedly called it the "Iliad Flow" because of how long and tortuous it was. That lawsuit resulted in a $2.5 billion settlement. But that's the exception. Not the rule.

So what do you actually do?

I don't have a clean answer.

Email bankruptcy doesn't work because the zombie lists find you again. Obsessive inbox management doesn't scale because the volume is designed to outpace your attention. Unsubscribing from everything is whack-a-mole that never ends.

What I'm trying now is aggressive filtering, ruthless unsubscribing from anything that doesn't bring real value, and making peace with the fact that some emails will just pile up in folders I'll never open. I'm also being way more careful about what email address I hand out. Throwaway for purchases. Real address only for things I actually want to hear from.

The deeper problem is that email's original promise has been completely hijacked. Async communication that respects your time? That's gone. Your inbox isn't a communication tool anymore. It's ad inventory that happens to occasionally contain messages from actual humans.

Those 14,000 emails weren't my fault. But dealing with them is still my problem. That's the most infuriating part. The people filling your inbox with noise face no consequences for the attention they steal. The cost gets pushed entirely onto you.

So keep your head on a swivel. Check your email preferences everywhere, regularly. Audit your subscriptions. And maybe stop feeling so guilty about that unread count.

The system is rigged. You're not lazy.

You're just outgunned.